Everest table interpretation

[VingeFaan]

Hi.

Everest has recently implemented disconnection protection tables. PT has problems identifying these, and putting in the right category.

Tables names for NL$200 6 max, and categories they are put into:
Suva (no disc.prot) -> NL $2 (6 max) Correct
Kariba (disc.prot) -> NL $2 Not Correct (Should be 6 max)

There are also Speed tables, I dont play these so I dont know they are interpretated.

Important: There are also HU-tables (also differentiates between disc.prot and not, some are interpretated 1-on-1) which are put into the category NL $2, which obviously causes trouble. This means I cannot make NL$2 -> NL$2 6 max in preferences!

Can you guys look into it, or are there ways that I can correct this myself?

Thanks!

[ptrack pat]

You should be able to click the "Define Shorthanded Tables" link on the Everest auto-import window and add a new entry there for this other table that is not being defined as 6 max.

You can also change current sessions to 6 max using the 6 max/5 max/1-on-1 Conversion button on the Utilities > Database Maintenance and Options window.